Exogram Authority Runtime vs Kosha Model Discovery

In-depth architectural comparison of the Exogram Authority Runtime and Kosha Model Discovery MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Exogram Authority Runtime when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Exogram Authority Runtime Details

K

Choose Kosha Model Discovery when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Kosha Model Discovery Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Exogram Authority Runtime Developer Tools	K Kosha Model Discovery Developer Tools
Summary	Model Context Protocol server for the Exogram Authority Runtime.	Tells your agent which model to use and what it costs, across 45 providers and local runtimes.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "exogram-authority-runtime": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kosha-model-discovery": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "kosha-model-discovery"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons