Exogram Authority Runtime vs Idea to Motion

In-depth architectural comparison of the Exogram Authority Runtime and Idea to Motion MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Exogram Authority Runtime when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Exogram Authority Runtime Details

I

Choose Idea to Motion when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Idea to Motion Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Exogram Authority Runtime Developer Tools	I Idea to Motion Developer Tools
Summary	Model Context Protocol server for the Exogram Authority Runtime.	Make animated videos by asking Claude, Cursor or any MCP client. Your AI writes it, we render it.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "exogram-authority-runtime": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "idea-to-motion": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "idea-to-motion"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons