Exogram Authority Runtime vs FirmFax prop firm data

In-depth architectural comparison of the Exogram Authority Runtime and FirmFax prop firm data MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Exogram Authority Runtime when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Exogram Authority Runtime Details

F

Choose FirmFax prop firm data when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore FirmFax prop firm data Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Exogram Authority Runtime Developer Tools	F FirmFax prop firm data Developer Tools
Summary	Model Context Protocol server for the Exogram Authority Runtime.	Independent rule and fee data on 71 prop trading firms, every figure with its evidence state.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "exogram-authority-runtime": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "firmfax-prop-firm-data": {
      "url": "https://firmfax.com/mcp/"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons