Exogram Authority Runtime vs Fast MCP Ssh

In-depth architectural comparison of the Exogram Authority Runtime and Fast MCP Ssh MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Exogram Authority Runtime when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Exogram Authority Runtime Details

Choose Fast MCP Ssh when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Fast MCP Ssh Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Exogram Authority Runtime Developer Tools	Fast MCP Ssh Developer Tools
Summary	Model Context Protocol server for the Exogram Authority Runtime.	SSH, SFTP and persistent PTY shells for AI agents. One Rust binary, no runtime.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "exogram-authority-runtime": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fast-mcp-ssh": {
      "url": "https://crates.io/crates/fast-mcp-ssh"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons