Playwright MCP Server vs WebUplink

In-depth architectural comparison of the Playwright MCP Server and WebUplink MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Playwright MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: start_codegen_session, end_codegen_session, get_codegen_session.

Explore Playwright MCP Server Details

Choose WebUplink when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: browse, close_session.

Explore WebUplink Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Playwright MCP Server executeautomation Browser Automation	WebUplink Browser Automation
Summary	An MCP server using Playwright for browser automation and webscrapping	Give any MCP client the ability to browse and interact with the web via WebUplink.
Category & Scope	Browser Automation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "executeautomation-playwright-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@executeautomation/playwright-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "webuplink": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "--yes",
        "--package",
        "@webuplink/mcp",
        "webuplink-mcp-http"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons