Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Eu Parliament vs Worldbank MCP
In-depth architectural comparison of the Eu Parliament and Worldbank MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Eu Parliament
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 32/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Worldbank MCP
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 37/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Eu Parliament if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Worldbank MCP if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
E
Choose Eu Parliament when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
W
Choose Worldbank MCP when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Eu Parliament Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Worldbank MCP Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Eu Parliament Configuration
Worldbank MCP Configuration