Etix MCP vs AutoTS

In-depth architectural comparison of the Etix MCP and AutoTS MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Etix MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Etix MCP Details

A

Choose AutoTS when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AutoTS Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Etix MCP Developer Tools	A AutoTS Developer Tools
Summary	Etix event discovery for Claude — search events, venues & performers and fetch event details	Automated time series forecasting with model search, anomaly detection, and event risk analysis
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "etix-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "etix-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "autots": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "autots"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons