Etincel Nonfiction vs MCP Audit

In-depth architectural comparison of the Etincel Nonfiction and MCP Audit MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

E

Choose Etincel Nonfiction when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Etincel Nonfiction Details

Choose MCP Audit when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MCP Audit Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	E Etincel Nonfiction Security	MCP Audit Security
Summary	Trainable non-fiction writing voice, presets, and an anti-AI-tells audit for Claude, via MCP.	Transparent audit proxy for MCP servers: logs every tool call, flags poisoning and rug pulls.
Category & Scope	Security	Security
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "etincel-nonfiction": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "etincel-nonfiction"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-audit-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons