Etherscan API MCP vs Wormhole MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Etherscan API MCP and Wormhole MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Etherscan API MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Etherscan API MCP Details

Choose Wormhole MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Wormhole MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Etherscan API MCP Developer Tools	Wormhole MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Etherscan Api MCP server — 71 tools for AI agent integration. Hosted by Junct.	Wormhole MCP server — 69 tools for AI agent integration. Hosted by Junct.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "etherscan-api-mcp": {
      "url": "https://etherscan-api.mcp.junct.dev/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "wormhole-mcp": {
      "url": "https://junct.dev"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons