What is the key difference between ESET PROTECT and Kody?

ESET PROTECT belongs to the Security category with local stdio execution, while Kody belongs to the Security category with local stdio execution.

How do I install ESET PROTECT or Kody in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are ESET PROTECT and Kody free or paid?

ESET PROTECT operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Kody operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

ESET PROTECT lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Kody lists 0 tools with 1 views and 673 GitHub stars.

Can I use both ESET PROTECT and Kody together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

ESET PROTECT vs Kody

In-depth architectural comparison of the ESET PROTECT and Kody MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

ESET PROTECT

Security · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Kody

Security · Local stdio

Quality: 49/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose ESET PROTECT if you need specialized Security tools running via a local process. Choose Kody if your workspace requires Security integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose ESET PROTECT when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ESET PROTECT Details

Choose Kody when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Kody Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	E ESET PROTECT Security	Kody Security
Summary	MCP server for ESET PROTECT's ESET Connect API - device, EDR, vulnerability, patch, and user data.	Personal assistant MCP server with search, execute, packages, jobs, secrets, and integrations.
Category & Scope	Security	Security
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

ESET PROTECT Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Kody Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

ESET PROTECT Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "eset-protect": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "eset-protect"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Kody Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kody": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "create-epicflare"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

ESET PROTECT is categorized under Security and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Kody belongs to Security using local stdio subprocess. Select ESET PROTECT when you need capabilities focused on security and Kody when you require tools for security.

More alternatives to ESET PROTECT More alternatives to Kody Security category hub