Erc8004 Agent Liveness vs Three.js DevTools MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Erc8004 Agent Liveness and Three.js DevTools MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Erc8004 Agent Liveness when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Erc8004 Agent Liveness Details

Choose Three.js DevTools MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Three.js DevTools MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Erc8004 Agent Liveness Developer Tools	Three.js DevTools MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Checks whether an ERC-8004-registered agent is actually alive right now via a real MCP handshake	Inspect and edit Three.js scenes, materials, shaders, lights in real time from any AI agent
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "erc8004-agent-liveness": {
      "url": "https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8004"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "three-js-devtools-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "threejs-devtools-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons