Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide vs Registeroracle
In-depth architectural comparison of the Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide and Registeroracle MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide
Legal · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 49/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Registeroracle
Legal · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 49/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide if you need specialized Legal tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Registeroracle if your workspace requires Legal integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide Tools (6)
search
Volltextsuche mit Lucene-Syntax. Filter nach Entscheiddatum, Scrape-Datum, Hierarchie (Kanton / Gericht / Kammer) und Sprache. Sortierung nach Relevanz, Entscheiddatum oder Scrape-Datum. Paginierung über `next_cursor` / `search_after`. Aggregationen für Facetten-Auswertung.
search_by_case_number
Exakte Phrasensuche nach Geschäftsnummern, Aktenzeichen und BGE-Zitaten (z.B. `BGE 142 III 1`, `6B_1234/2025`, `5A_396/2015`). Setzt die Nummer automatisch in Anführungszeichen.
fetch_document
Vollständigen Entscheid samt Volltext anhand der ID abrufen.
list_hierarchy
Hierarchie-IDs (Bund / Kanton / Gericht / Kammer) mit Trefferzahlen.
list_facets
Hierarchischer Facetten-Baum mit lokalisierten Labels in DE/FR/IT.
server_info
Versions- und Konfigurationsinformationen.
Registeroracle Tools (10)
register_provider
Add or update an ICT third-party provider in the DORA Register of Information (A
list_providers
List all ICT third-party providers in the Register of Information with optional
get_provider
Get full details, risk flags, and ITS completeness of a specific provider.
validate_roi
Validate entire Register of Information against DORA ITS requirements.
concentration_risk
Analyze ICT concentration risks across providers, countries, cloud types.
ctpp_check
Assess if a provider might qualify as Critical Third-Party Provider (CTPP)
export_its
Export Register of Information in ITS-compliant format for supervisory reporting
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide Configuration
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide is categorized under Legal and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Registeroracle belongs to Legal using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide when you need capabilities focused on legal and Registeroracle when you require tools for legal.