Entscheidsuche — Schw… vs Federal Regulations M… | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide vs Federal Regulations MCP Server
In-depth architectural comparison of the Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide and Federal Regulations MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide
Legal · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 49/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Federal Regulations MCP Server
Legal · Local stdio
Quality: 51/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide if you need specialized Legal tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Federal Regulations MCP Server if your workspace requires Legal integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide Tools (6)
search
Volltextsuche mit Lucene-Syntax. Filter nach Entscheiddatum, Scrape-Datum, Hierarchie (Kanton / Gericht / Kammer) und Sprache. Sortierung nach Relevanz, Entscheiddatum oder Scrape-Datum. Paginierung über `next_cursor` / `search_after`. Aggregationen für Facetten-Auswertung.
search_by_case_number
Exakte Phrasensuche nach Geschäftsnummern, Aktenzeichen und BGE-Zitaten (z.B. `BGE 142 III 1`, `6B_1234/2025`, `5A_396/2015`). Setzt die Nummer automatisch in Anführungszeichen.
fetch_document
Vollständigen Entscheid samt Volltext anhand der ID abrufen.
list_hierarchy
Hierarchie-IDs (Bund / Kanton / Gericht / Kammer) mit Trefferzahlen.
list_facets
Hierarchischer Facetten-Baum mit lokalisierten Labels in DE/FR/IT.
server_info
Versions- und Konfigurationsinformationen.
Federal Regulations MCP Server Tools (7)
regulations_search_rules
Search proposed rules, final rules, notices, and presidential documents by query, type, agency, date range, and open-for-comment status. The primary discovery entry point.
regulations_get_document
Fetch one FR document by number — full metadata plus the cross-source handles (docket ID, CFR parts, comment count) that chain into the comment and codified-text tools.
regulations_browse_cfr
Walk the CFR hierarchy (structure mode) or full-text-search the codified CFR (search mode). Both feed `regulations_get_cfr_section`.
regulations_get_cfr_section
Read the codified text at a CFR location — a section, a whole part, or an appendix — current or as of a past date.
regulations_get_docket
Pull a rulemaking docket and the documents filed in it (NPRM, final rule, supporting materials).
regulations_find_comments
Fetch public comments on a document or docket, or one comment's full body and attachments. Flags attachment-only submissions.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide Configuration
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide is categorized under Legal and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Federal Regulations MCP Server belongs to Legal using local stdio subprocess. Select Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide when you need capabilities focused on legal and Federal Regulations MCP Server when you require tools for legal.