Entscheidsuche — Schw… vs Eur Lex MCP Server | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide vs Eur Lex MCP Server
In-depth architectural comparison of the Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide and Eur Lex MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide
Legal · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 49/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Eur Lex MCP Server
Legal · Local stdio
Quality: 55/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide if you need specialized Legal tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Eur Lex MCP Server if your workspace requires Legal integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide Tools (6)
search
Volltextsuche mit Lucene-Syntax. Filter nach Entscheiddatum, Scrape-Datum, Hierarchie (Kanton / Gericht / Kammer) und Sprache. Sortierung nach Relevanz, Entscheiddatum oder Scrape-Datum. Paginierung über `next_cursor` / `search_after`. Aggregationen für Facetten-Auswertung.
search_by_case_number
Exakte Phrasensuche nach Geschäftsnummern, Aktenzeichen und BGE-Zitaten (z.B. `BGE 142 III 1`, `6B_1234/2025`, `5A_396/2015`). Setzt die Nummer automatisch in Anführungszeichen.
fetch_document
Vollständigen Entscheid samt Volltext anhand der ID abrufen.
list_hierarchy
Hierarchie-IDs (Bund / Kanton / Gericht / Kammer) mit Trefferzahlen.
list_facets
Hierarchischer Facetten-Baum mit lokalisierten Labels in DE/FR/IT.
server_info
Versions- und Konfigurationsinformationen.
Eur Lex MCP Server Tools (7)
eurlex_search_documents
Search EU legislation, treaties, and preparatory acts across the CELLAR corpus. Filters by document category, date range, EuroVoc concept, author institution, and in-force status; consolidated texts can be folded in through the selected basic-act family.
eurlex_get_document
Fetch structured metadata and full text (HTML, Markdown, or Formex4 XML) for a work by CELEX number, ELI URI, or CELLAR work URI.
eurlex_lookup_celex
Resolve an EU legal citation — a CELEX number or an ELI URI — to the canonical CELLAR work.
eurlex_get_cases
Search CJEU and General Court case law — judgments, orders, and Advocate General opinions — by case number, party name, subject, or date range.
eurlex_get_relations
Traverse the CELLAR relationship graph: amendment chain, consolidated versions, legal basis, citation network, and national transposition measures.
eurlex_browse_subjects
Search the EuroVoc multilingual thesaurus to resolve human-readable terms to EuroVoc concept IDs — required before using the `eurovoc_concept` filter in `eurlex_search_documents`.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide Configuration
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide is categorized under Legal and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Eur Lex MCP Server belongs to Legal using local stdio subprocess. Select Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide when you need capabilities focused on legal and Eur Lex MCP Server when you require tools for legal.
Execute a raw SPARQL SELECT query against the CELLAR Virtuoso endpoint. Results capped at 100; use only when curated tools don't cover the needed CDM ontology traversal.