What is the key difference between Enoch and Iterminal?

Enoch belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution, while Iterminal belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Enoch or Iterminal in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Enoch and Iterminal free or paid?

Enoch operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Iterminal operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Enoch lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Iterminal lists 0 tools with 0 views and 4 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Enoch and Iterminal together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Enoch vs Iterminal

In-depth architectural comparison of the Enoch and Iterminal MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Enoch

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 35/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Iterminal

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 31/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Enoch if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Iterminal if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Enoch when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Enoch Details

Choose Iterminal when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Iterminal Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Enoch Developer Tools	Iterminal Developer Tools
Summary	Operate an Enoch control plane through MCP tools	MCP Server for iTerminal SSH Connection Manager - Control SSH servers through Claude.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Enoch Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Iterminal Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Enoch Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "enoch": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "enoch-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Iterminal Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "iterminal": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "iterminal"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Enoch is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Iterminal belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Enoch when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Iterminal when you require tools for developer tools.

More alternatives to Enoch More alternatives to Iterminal Developer Tools category hub