Engram Cc vs Mcp Persona Sessions

In-depth architectural comparison of the Engram Cc and Mcp Persona Sessions MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

E

Choose Engram Cc when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Engram Cc Details

Choose Mcp Persona Sessions when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Persona-driven session management with detailed profiles, Built-in timer controls: start, stop, and status checks, Predefined and customizable session frameworks.

Explore Mcp Persona Sessions Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	E Engram Cc Knowledge & Memory	Mcp Persona Sessions mattjoyce Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Universal AI coding assistant memory — session handoff, SLM compression, and semantic retrieval.	Enable AI assistants to conduct structured, persona-driven sessions including interview preparation, personal reflection, and coaching conversations. Built-in timer management and performance evaluation tools.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "engram-cc": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "engram-cc"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mattjoyce-mcp-persona-sessions": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "fastmcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons