Emilia Protocol vs Orihime

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
Emilia Protocol
emiliaprotocol
🔒 Security
O
Orihime
srinivasan-sundaresan95
🔒 Security
SummaryHuman sign-off + trust receipts for AI agents: requires a named human's approval before an irreversible action (payment release, record change, deploy), then mints an offline-verifiable Ed25519 Trust Receipt. Also exposes trust profiles, receipt verification, disputes, and delegation. Apache-2.0; policy engine formally verified. Install: npx -y @emilia-protocol/mcp-server.Cross-repository code knowledge graph MCP server for Java, Kotlin, JavaScript, and TypeScript. Indexes source into embedded KuzuDB via tree-sitter; 30+ tools for call-flow tracing, multi-hop taint analysis (OWASP/CWE/PCI/STIG reports), entry-point reachability filtering, performance hotspot detection, and license compliance — without reading source files. 95% fewer tokens vs source-reading baseline. pip install orihime
Quality signal27/100 (Emerging)25/100 (Emerging)
Install pathnpx · highpip · high
Engagement 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1
ToolsNot listed yetNot listed yet
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView Emilia ProtocolView Orihime
More alternatives to Emilia ProtocolMore alternatives to OrihimeSecurity category

Other servers like Emilia Protocol