Emilia Protocol vs Sast Mcp Server

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
Emilia Protocol
emiliaprotocol
🔒 Security
S
🔒 Security
SummaryHuman sign-off + trust receipts for AI agents: requires a named human's approval before an irreversible action (payment release, record change, deploy), then mints an offline-verifiable Ed25519 Trust Receipt. Also exposes trust profiles, receipt verification, disputes, and delegation. Apache-2.0; policy engine formally verified. Install: npx -y @emilia-protocol/mcp-server.SAST/DAST server exposing 11 security scanners (Bandit, Semgrep, Trivy, CodeQL, Checkov, Gitleaks, OSV-Scanner, Grype, OWASP ZAP, and more) with closed-loop remediation (scan→patch→re-scan→verify), SARIF/SBOM/VEX export, compliance reporting, and CI integrations (GitHub Advanced Security, DefectDojo, Slack, Jira).
Quality signal27/100 (Emerging)23/100 (Emerging)
Install pathnpx · highnpx · low
Engagement 0 0 0 6 0 0 0
ToolsNot listed yetNot listed yet
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView Emilia ProtocolView Sast Mcp Server
More alternatives to Emilia ProtocolMore alternatives to Sast Mcp ServerSecurity category

Other servers like Emilia Protocol