What is the key difference between Emilia Protocol and Phishunt?

Emilia Protocol belongs to the Security category with local stdio execution, while Phishunt belongs to the Security category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Emilia Protocol or Phishunt in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Emilia Protocol and Phishunt free or paid?

Emilia Protocol operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Phishunt operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Emilia Protocol lists 6 tools with 2 views and 851 GitHub stars. Phishunt lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Emilia Protocol and Phishunt together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install Emilia Protocol or Phishunt in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are Emilia Protocol and Phishunt free to use, or do they require API keys?

Emilia Protocol is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . Phishunt operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both Emilia Protocol and Phishunt at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both emiliaprotocol-emilia-protocol and phishunt as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, Emilia Protocol has a Quality Score of 61 /100 ( Good ) with 2 views, 0 installs, and 851 GitHub stars. Phishunt holds a Quality Score of 27 /100 ( Emerging ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Emilia Protocol vs Phishunt

In-depth architectural comparison of the Emilia Protocol and Phishunt MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Emilia Protocol

Security · Local stdio

Quality: 61/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required

Phishunt

Security · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Emilia Protocol if you need specialized Security tools running via a local process. Choose Phishunt if your workspace requires Security integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Emilia Protocol when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Primary tools included: Named-human approval for irreversible actions, Offline-verifiable Ed25519 Trust Receipts, Trust profile access.

Explore Emilia Protocol Details

Choose Phishunt when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Phishunt Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Emilia Protocol emiliaprotocol Security	P Phishunt Security
Summary	Human sign-off + trust receipts for AI agents: requires a named human's approval before an irreversible action (payment release, record change, deploy), then mints an offline-verifiable Ed25519 Trust Receipt. Also exposes trust profiles, receipt verification, disputes, and delegation. Apache-2.0; policy engine formally verified. Install: npx -y @emilia-protocol/mcp-server.	Public phishing feed: suspicious/confirmed phishing URLs detected hourly. No auth, CC0.
Category & Scope	Security

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Emilia Protocol Tools (6)

Named-human approval for irreversible actions

Offline-verifiable Ed25519 Trust Receipts

Trust profile access

Receipt verification

Dispute handling

Delegation support

Phishunt Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Emilia Protocol Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "emiliaprotocol-emilia-protocol": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@emilia-protocol/scan"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Phishunt Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "phishunt": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "phishunt"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Emilia Protocol is categorized under Security and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Phishunt belongs to Security using local stdio subprocess. Select Emilia Protocol when you need capabilities focused on security and Phishunt when you require tools for security.

More alternatives to Emilia Protocol More alternatives to Phishunt Security category hub