Taskbounty Check vs Codeinspectus

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
Taskbounty Check
eliottreich
🔒 Security
C
🔒 Security
SummaryLocal-only GitHub Actions and CI maintenance scanner for AI-built apps. Exposes scanrepo, explainfinding, and generatefixplan to MCP clients; reads only allowlisted workflow and update configuration, modifies nothing, makes no outbound requests by default, and has zero runtime dependencies. Run with npx -y taskbounty-check@0.1.6 mcp.Local-first, zero-egress security scanner for AI-generated / "vibe-coded" JS/TS. Bundles Opengrep, Gitleaks & Trivy behind one CWE-keyed schema and adds AI-code-specific checks (client-side secret exposure, Supabase RLS, prompt-injection & LLM-output XSS sinks). No account, no telemetry.
Quality signal24/100 (Emerging)27/100 (Emerging)
Install pathnpx · highnpx · low
Engagement 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 36
ToolsNot listed yetNot listed yet
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView Taskbounty CheckView Codeinspectus
More alternatives to Taskbounty CheckMore alternatives to CodeinspectusSecurity category

Other servers like Taskbounty Check