Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Egov Law MCP vs Houki Egov MCP
In-depth architectural comparison of the Egov Law MCP and Houki Egov MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Egov Law MCP
Legal · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Houki Egov MCP
Legal · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Egov Law MCP if you need specialized Legal tools running via a local process. Choose Houki Egov MCP if your workspace requires Legal integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
E
Choose Egov Law MCP when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
H
Choose Houki Egov MCP when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Egov Law MCP Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Houki Egov MCP Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Egov Law MCP Configuration
Houki Egov MCP Configuration