What is the key difference between Yutu and Umbriel?

Yutu belongs to the Browser Automation category with local stdio execution, while Umbriel belongs to the Browser Automation category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Yutu or Umbriel in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Yutu and Umbriel free or paid?

Yutu operates under a BYOK (Pay Provider Direct) model (OAuth 2.0). Umbriel operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Yutu lists 5 tools with 4 views and 606 GitHub stars. Umbriel lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Yutu and Umbriel together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install Yutu or Umbriel in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are Yutu and Umbriel free to use, or do they require API keys?

Yutu is listed under a BYOK (Pay Provider Direct) model with OAuth 2.0 . Umbriel operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both Yutu and Umbriel at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both eat-pray-ai-yutu and umbriel as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, Yutu has a Quality Score of 51 /100 ( Good ) with 4 views, 0 installs, and 606 GitHub stars. Umbriel holds a Quality Score of 27 /100 ( Emerging ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Yutu vs Umbriel

In-depth architectural comparison of the Yutu and Umbriel MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Yutu

Browser Automation · Local stdio

Quality: 51/100 (Good) | Auth: OAuth 2.0

Umbriel

Browser Automation · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Yutu if you need specialized Browser Automation tools running via a local process. Choose Umbriel if your workspace requires Browser Automation integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Yutu when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: OAuth 2.0 (BYOK (Pay Provider Direct)).
You have access to required keys: YUTU_CREDENTIAL, YUTU_CACHE_TOKEN, YUTU_ROOT.
Primary tools included: YouTube Data API v3 integration for video and channel management, OAuth 2.0 authentication with token caching, CLI and MCP server interfaces for automation.

Explore Yutu Details

Choose Umbriel when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Umbriel Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Yutu eat-pray-ai Browser Automation	U Umbriel Browser Automation
Summary	A fully functional MCP server and CLI for YouTube to automate YouTube operation	Playwright for the Windows desktop, from Bun — drive native GUIs via UI Automation + MCP.
Category & Scope	Browser Automation	Browser Automation
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Yutu Tools (5)

YouTube Data API v3 integration for video and channel management

OAuth 2.0 authentication with token caching

CLI and MCP server interfaces for automation

Support for YouTube Analytics and Reporting APIs (optional)

Configurable credential and token paths via environment variables

Umbriel Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Yutu Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "eat-pray-ai-yutu": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ],
      "env": {
        "YUTU_CREDENTIAL": "YOUR_YUTU_CREDENTIAL_HERE",
        "YUTU_CACHE_TOKEN": "YOUR_YUTU_CACHE_TOKEN_HERE",
        "YUTU_ROOT": "YOUR_YUTU_ROOT_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Umbriel Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "umbriel": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "umbriel"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Yutu is categorized under Browser Automation and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Umbriel belongs to Browser Automation using local stdio subprocess. Select Yutu when you need capabilities focused on browser automation and Umbriel when you require tools for browser automation.

More alternatives to Yutu More alternatives to Umbriel Browser Automation category hub