Earth 2 Elevation MCP vs Open Elevation

In-depth architectural comparison of the Earth 2 Elevation MCP and Open Elevation MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Earth 2 Elevation MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Location Services domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_elevation, get_elevations, get_elevation_profile.

Explore Earth 2 Elevation MCP Details

Choose Open Elevation when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Location Services domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Open Elevation Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Earth 2 Elevation MCP Location Services	Open Elevation Location Services
Summary	Local stdio MCP server for Open-Elevation single, batch, and profile lookups.	Open-Elevation MCP — terrain elevation by lat/lon (no auth)
Category & Scope	Location Services	Location Services

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "earth-2-elevation-mcp": {
      "url": "https://api.open-elevation.com"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "open-elevation": {
      "url": "https://api.open-elevation.com/api/v1/"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons