What is the key difference between Dynatrace and Xitoring?

Dynatrace belongs to the Monitoring category with local stdio execution, while Xitoring belongs to the Monitoring category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Dynatrace or Xitoring in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Dynatrace and Xitoring free or paid?

Dynatrace operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Xitoring operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Dynatrace lists 0 tools with 0 views and 135 GitHub stars. Xitoring lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Dynatrace and Xitoring together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Dynatrace vs Xitoring

In-depth architectural comparison of the Dynatrace and Xitoring MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Dynatrace

Monitoring · Local stdio

Quality: 45/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Xitoring

Monitoring · Local stdio

Quality: 28/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Dynatrace if you need specialized Monitoring tools running via a local process. Choose Xitoring if your workspace requires Monitoring integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Dynatrace when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Dynatrace Details

Choose Xitoring when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Xitoring Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	D Dynatrace Monitoring	X Xitoring Monitoring
Summary	Connect AI assistants to Dynatrace to query observability data and analyze problems.	Connect AI assistants to Xitoring monitoring: servers, uptime, incidents, metrics, SSL, and alerts.
Category & Scope	Monitoring	Monitoring
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Dynatrace Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Xitoring Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Dynatrace Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dynatrace": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Xitoring Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "xitoring": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "xitoring"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Dynatrace is categorized under Monitoring and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Xitoring belongs to Monitoring using local stdio subprocess. Select Dynatrace when you need capabilities focused on monitoring and Xitoring when you require tools for monitoring.

More alternatives to Dynatrace More alternatives to Xitoring Monitoring category hub