Dvalincode vs Trestle

In-depth architectural comparison of the Dvalincode and Trestle MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Dvalincode when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Dvalincode Details

Choose Trestle when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Trestle Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Dvalincode Security	Trestle Security
Summary	Deterministic security scanning that needs no model or API key, plus governed coding tasks.	Detects leaked secrets (API keys, tokens, private keys) in source code.
Category & Scope	Security	Security
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dvalincode": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "dvalincode"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "trestle": {
      "url": "https://trestlescan.com"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons