Skylos vs Arai

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
S
Skylos
duriantaco
🔒 Security
A
Arai
taniwhaai
🔒 Security
SummaryDead code detection, security scanning, and code quality analysis for Python, TypeScript, and Go. 98% recall with fewer false positives than Vulture. Includes AI-powered remediation.Policy enforcement for AI coding agents derived from existing instruction files (CLAUDE.md, .cursorrules, .windsurfrules, .github/copilot-instructions.md) — no separate YAML to maintain. Rules with prohibitive predicates (never, forbids, mustnot) emit permissionDecision: deny to block tool calls in Claude Code; advisory rules inject context. PostToolUse is correlated with PreToolUse to produce per-rule obeyed/ignored compliance verdicts in a local JSONL audit log. MCP tools — araiaddguard (register rules mid-session), arailistguards, arairecentdecisions — work in any MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline). No network on the hook hot path; opt-out anonymous telemetry.
Quality signal29/100 (Emerging)27/100 (Emerging)
Install pathpip · highnpx · low
Engagement 2 0 0 482 0 0 0 7
ToolsNot listed yetNot listed yet
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView SkylosView Arai
More alternatives to SkylosMore alternatives to AraiSecurity category

Other servers like Skylos