Skylos vs Orihime

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
S
Skylos
duriantaco
🔒 Security
O
Orihime
srinivasan-sundaresan95
🔒 Security
SummaryDead code detection, security scanning, and code quality analysis for Python, TypeScript, and Go. 98% recall with fewer false positives than Vulture. Includes AI-powered remediation.Cross-repository code knowledge graph MCP server for Java, Kotlin, JavaScript, and TypeScript. Indexes source into embedded KuzuDB via tree-sitter; 30+ tools for call-flow tracing, multi-hop taint analysis (OWASP/CWE/PCI/STIG reports), entry-point reachability filtering, performance hotspot detection, and license compliance — without reading source files. 95% fewer tokens vs source-reading baseline. pip install orihime
Quality signal29/100 (Emerging)25/100 (Emerging)
Install pathpip · highpip · high
Engagement 2 0 0 482 0 0 0 1
ToolsNot listed yetNot listed yet
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView SkylosView Orihime
More alternatives to SkylosMore alternatives to OrihimeSecurity category

Other servers like Skylos