Skylos vs Sast Mcp Server

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
S
Skylos
duriantaco
🔒 Security
S
🔒 Security
SummaryDead code detection, security scanning, and code quality analysis for Python, TypeScript, and Go. 98% recall with fewer false positives than Vulture. Includes AI-powered remediation.SAST/DAST server exposing 11 security scanners (Bandit, Semgrep, Trivy, CodeQL, Checkov, Gitleaks, OSV-Scanner, Grype, OWASP ZAP, and more) with closed-loop remediation (scan→patch→re-scan→verify), SARIF/SBOM/VEX export, compliance reporting, and CI integrations (GitHub Advanced Security, DefectDojo, Slack, Jira).
Quality signal29/100 (Emerging)23/100 (Emerging)
Install pathpip · highnpx · low
Engagement 2 0 0 482 0 0 0
ToolsNot listed yetNot listed yet
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView SkylosView Sast Mcp Server
More alternatives to SkylosMore alternatives to Sast Mcp ServerSecurity category

Other servers like Skylos