Skylos vs Lazaretto Mcp

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
Skylos logo
Skylos
duriantaco
🔒 Security
Lazaretto Mcp logo
Lazaretto Mcp
jamesdfinance-dev
🔒 Security
SummaryDead code detection, security scanning, and code quality analysis for Python, TypeScript, and Go. 98% recall with fewer false positives than Vulture. Includes AI-powered remediation.Check whether anything you depend on is known malware, before an agent installs it. checklockfile takes a package-lock.json, yarn.lock or pnpm-lock.yaml and matches every pinned version against published malicious-package advisories in one call, free and with no API key, catching compromised releases like chalk@5.6.1 while leaving their clean releases alone. scanartifact adds deterministic behavioral analysis (no LLM in the serving path) for credential theft, exfiltration, obfuscation, prompt injection and install-time droppers, with the file, line and evidence that triggered it; verdicts are SHA-256-bound so you can re-verify what landed on disk. Paid scans settle at $0.03 USDC on Base (x402) or prepaid credits. npx lazaretto-mcp
Quality signal51/100 (Fair)51/100 (Fair)
Install pathuvx · highRemote · high
Engagement 4 0 0 499 1 0 0 0
ToolsDead code detection with high recall and low false positivesSecurity scanning including dangerous data flows and secretsQuality analysis covering complexity, nesting, and duplicationAI-powered remediation suggestions and defect checksLocal and CI/CD usage with GitHub Actions supportSupport for multiple languages including Python, TypeScript, Go, Java, and moreknown_bad_lookupscan_artifact
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView SkylosView Lazaretto Mcp
More alternatives to SkylosMore alternatives to Lazaretto McpSecurity category

Other servers like Skylos