Doublespeed — Xcode as an API vs Postmancer

In-depth architectural comparison of the Doublespeed — Xcode as an API and Postmancer MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

D

Choose Doublespeed — Xcode as an API when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: discover_projs, list_schemes, list_sims.

Explore Doublespeed — Xcode as an API Details

Choose Postmancer when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: http_request, list_collections, list_requests.

Explore Postmancer Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	D Doublespeed — Xcode as an API Developer Tools	Postmancer hijaz Developer Tools
Summary
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "doublespeed-xcode-as-an-api": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@doublespeed/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hijaz-postmancer": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "postmancer"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons