What is the key difference between DoneThat and OpenAkashic?

DoneThat belongs to the Knowledge & Memory category with local stdio execution, while OpenAkashic belongs to the Knowledge & Memory category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install DoneThat or OpenAkashic in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are DoneThat and OpenAkashic free or paid?

DoneThat operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). OpenAkashic operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

DoneThat lists 0 tools with 1 views and 0 GitHub stars. OpenAkashic lists 0 tools with 1 views and 3 GitHub stars.

Can I use both DoneThat and OpenAkashic together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

DoneThat vs OpenAkashic

In-depth architectural comparison of the DoneThat and OpenAkashic MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

DoneThat

Knowledge & Memory · Local stdio

Quality: 37/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

OpenAkashic

Knowledge & Memory · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 36/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose DoneThat if you need specialized Knowledge & Memory tools running via a local process. Choose OpenAkashic if your workspace requires Knowledge & Memory integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose DoneThat when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore DoneThat Details

Choose OpenAkashic when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore OpenAkashic Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	D DoneThat Knowledge & Memory	OpenAkashic Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Privacy-first work tracking with summaries, reports, coaching, and AI-ready long-term memory.	Shared long-term memory vault for AI agents with 20 MCP tools.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

DoneThat Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

OpenAkashic Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

DoneThat Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "donethat": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "donethat"
      ]
    }
  }
}

OpenAkashic Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "openakashic": {
      "url": "https://api.openakashic.com/capsules?q=your+problem"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

DoneThat is categorized under Knowledge & Memory and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, OpenAkashic belongs to Knowledge & Memory using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select DoneThat when you need capabilities focused on knowledge & memory and OpenAkashic when you require tools for knowledge & memory.

More alternatives to DoneThat More alternatives to OpenAkashic Knowledge & Memory category hub