Domain History Contac… vs Exogram Authority Run… | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Domain History Contact OSINT Previous Owner + WHOIS History vs Exogram Authority Runtime
In-depth architectural comparison of the Domain History Contact OSINT Previous Owner + WHOIS History and Exogram Authority Runtime MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Domain History Contact OSINT Previous Owner + WHOIS History
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 28/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Exogram Authority Runtime
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 44/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Domain History Contact OSINT Previous Owner + WHOIS History if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Exogram Authority Runtime if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Domain History Contact OSINT Previous Owner + WHOIS History when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Domain History Contact OSINT Previous Owner + WHOIS History is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Exogram Authority Runtime belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Domain History Contact OSINT Previous Owner + WHOIS History when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Exogram Authority Runtime when you require tools for developer tools.