Dokumendiregister.ee — Estonian public Authority documents vs Codesurface
In-depth architectural comparison of the Dokumendiregister.ee — Estonian public Authority documents and Codesurface MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Dokumendiregister.ee — Estonian public Authority documents
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 51/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Codesurface
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 55/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Dokumendiregister.ee — Estonian public Authority documents if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Codesurface if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Dokumendiregister.ee — Estonian public Authority documents when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Dokumendiregister.ee — Estonian public Authority documents is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Codesurface belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Dokumendiregister.ee — Estonian public Authority documents when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Codesurface when you require tools for developer tools.