Contract Parser vs Texas Ag Opinions

A side-by-side look at the Contract Parser and Texas Ag Opinions MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.

Contract Parser logoContract ParserLegal · Remote HTTP/SSETurn any PDF into structured JSON via AI + OCR: invoices, bank statements, contracts.39FairAuth: not declaredTexas Ag Opinions logoTexas Ag OpinionsLegal · Local subprocess (stdio)Texas Attorney General opinions — statute-citation search over recorded45FairAuth: no auth required

Verdict: choose Contract Parser for legal work over a hosted endpoint; choose Texas Ag Opinions for legal as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.

Which MCP server should you choose?

Contract Parser logoChoose Contract Parser when

  • You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
  • You prefer a remote HTTP/SSE transport.
Explore Contract Parser

Texas Ag Opinions logoChoose Texas Ag Opinions when

  • You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
  • You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
  • Its auth model fits you: No auth required.
Explore Texas Ag Opinions

Feature & specification comparison

Rows where the two servers differ are marked.

SpecContract Parser logoContract ParserTexas Ag Opinions logoTexas Ag Opinions
CategoryLegalLegal
Quality signal39/100 · Fair45/100 · Fair
Install commandConfirmedConfirmed
TransportRemote HTTP/SSELocal subprocess (stdio)
AuthNot declaredNo auth required
PricingNot declaredFree
Required env varsNone listedNone listed
Verified ownerCommunity listingCommunity listing
GitHub stars80
Directory activity 2 views 0 installs 0 upvotes 1 views 0 installs 0 upvotes
ToolsNot listedNot listed

Tools & capabilities

Contract Parser tools

No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.

Texas Ag Opinions tools

No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.

Ready-to-paste client configs

Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.

Contract Parser

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "document-to-json-pdf-invoice-statement-contract-parser": {
      "url": "https://mcp.apify.com/?actors=opportunity-biz/document-to-json-mcp"
    }
  }
}

Texas Ag Opinions

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "texas-ag-opinions": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@pipeworx/mcp-texas-ag-opinions"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently asked questions

Contract Parser is categorized under Legal and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Texas Ag Opinions belongs to Legal and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick Contract Parser for legal work and Texas Ag Opinions for legal.

Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.

Contract Parser has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Texas Ag Opinions is listed as free. Auth: no auth required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.

Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add document-to-json-pdf-invoice-statement-contract-parser and texas-ag-opinions as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.

On AllMCPs, Contract Parser has a quality signal of 39/100 (Fair) with 2 views, 0 installs and 8 GitHub stars. Texas Ag Opinions has 45/100 (Fair) with 1 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars.