Docs vs Interactive Leetcode MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Docs and Interactive Leetcode MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

D

Choose Docs when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: functionSignature, description, includeExample.

Explore Docs Details

Choose Interactive Leetcode MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: csrftoken, session, titleSlug.

Explore Interactive Leetcode MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	D Docs Developer Tools	Interactive Leetcode MCP Developer Tools
Summary	JSDoc, README, changelog generation for AI agents	Interactive LeetCode MCP server with authorization and solution submission capabilities
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "docs-8": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "docs-8"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "interactive-leetcode-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@sperekrestova/interactive-leetcode-mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons