Docs vs Acta Docs MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Docs and Acta Docs MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Docs when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Docs Details

Choose Acta Docs MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Acta Docs MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Docs Developer Tools	Acta Docs MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Search and read Empryo's documentation. Read-only, no auth, no local access.	Read-only MCP server for the official ACTA verifiable credentials documentation.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "docs-6": {
      "url": "https://empryo.com"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "docs-mcp-4": {
      "url": "https://docs.acta.build"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons