What is the key difference between Dockerfile Audit and Kdbx?

Dockerfile Audit belongs to the Security category with local stdio execution, while Kdbx belongs to the Security category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Dockerfile Audit or Kdbx in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Dockerfile Audit and Kdbx free or paid?

Dockerfile Audit operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Kdbx operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Dockerfile Audit lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Kdbx lists 0 tools with 0 views and 4 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Dockerfile Audit and Kdbx together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Dockerfile Audit vs Kdbx

In-depth architectural comparison of the Dockerfile Audit and Kdbx MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Dockerfile Audit

Security · Local stdio

Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Kdbx

Security · Local stdio

Quality: 35/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Dockerfile Audit if you need specialized Security tools running via a local process. Choose Kdbx if your workspace requires Security integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Dockerfile Audit when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Dockerfile Audit Details

Choose Kdbx when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Kdbx Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Dockerfile Audit Security	K Kdbx Security
Summary	Hadolint-grade Dockerfile audit — 19 checks: secrets, privileges, supply chain, hygiene.	Read-only access to secrets in a local KeePassXC vault. Runs commands with them injected.
Category & Scope	Security	Security
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Dockerfile Audit Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Kdbx Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Dockerfile Audit Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dockerfile-audit": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "without"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Kdbx Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kdbx": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "kdbx"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Dockerfile Audit is categorized under Security and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Kdbx belongs to Security using local stdio subprocess. Select Dockerfile Audit when you need capabilities focused on security and Kdbx when you require tools for security.

More alternatives to Dockerfile Audit More alternatives to Kdbx Security category hub