Doc.page PDF Extraction vs Context7

In-depth architectural comparison of the Doc.page PDF Extraction and Context7 MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

D

Choose Doc.page PDF Extraction when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Doc.page PDF Extraction Details

Choose Context7 when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: resolve-library-id, query-docs.

Explore Context7 Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	D Doc.page PDF Extraction Knowledge & Memory	Context7 upstash Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Extract PDFs to clean Markdown, RAG chunks and structured tables with page/bbox citations.	Up-to-date code documentation for LLMs and AI code editors.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "doc-page-pdf-extraction": {
      "url": "https://doc.page/en/api/"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "upstash-context7": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "ctx7"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons