Dk Eli MCP vs Hu Eli MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Dk Eli MCP and Hu Eli MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Dk Eli MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Dk Eli MCP Details

Choose Hu Eli MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: eli_uri, human_readable_citation, source_url.

Explore Hu Eli MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Dk Eli MCP Developer Tools	Hu Eli MCP Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for Danish legislation (Retsinformation) with native ELI and verifiable citations.	MCP server for Hungarian legislation (Nemzeti Jogszabalytar): native ELI and verifiable citations.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dk-eli-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "dk-eli-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hu-eli-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "hu-eli-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons