The full upstream README, mirrored here for reference. Install config, tool schemas, adoption signals, and an original overview live on the Nexus Legal MCP listing page.
MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for Nexus Legal — exposes 27 specialised legal capabilities to Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor and any other MCP-compatible client.
What is this? Connect your Claude to Nexus in 30 seconds. From then on Claude can run ISO 31000 legal analysis, Monte Carlo litigation simulation, case-law search, legal drafting, administrative doctrine, adversarial red teaming, multi-jurisdiction comparison (cross-border), citation verification, procedural time-limit computation, the statute↔case-law citation graph, and analysis of Box files by
file_id(box_analyze) — without leaving the conversation.
Go to legal.nexusquantum.legal/developers, choose "MCP server", give it a name (e.g. "personal MacBook") and press + Create MCP key. Copy the nlk_... key — it is shown only once.
Edit ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json:
Restart Claude Desktop. You will see a 🔌 icon in the chat with the 27 Nexus tools available.
Edit %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json with the same contents.
Edit ~/.cursor/mcp.json:
In Claude Desktop, type:
Analyse this contract with Nexus in jurisdiction GB, commercial branch, conservative profile: «[paste the contract text here]»
Claude will call the nexus_analyze tool and return the report with certainty locks [L1]/[L2-J]/[L3-NV]/[L4], blocking signals [L5-C]/[L5-P], and a NEXUS-AUDIT-TRAIL block.
| Tool | Capability | Typical cost |
|---|---|---|
nexus_analyze | Full legal analysis (Node A — ISO 31000) | 1-3 credits |
nexus_consulta | Open legal question, with or without a document | 1 credit |
nexus_draft | Legal drafting (appeal, claim, defence, clause…) | 2-4 credits |
nexus_audit | Cross-audit of a Node A analysis (Node B) | 1-2 credits |
nexus_consensus | Multi-agent consensus Node A ↔ Node B (analysis + adversarial audit in a loop until consensus; jurisdiction required; long operation ~3-6 min) | 3-7 credits |
nexus_monte_carlo | Monte Carlo scenario simulation (ISO 31000 §6) | 4 credits |
nexus_doctrina | Administrative doctrine search, by jurisdiction | 1 credit |
nexus_opinion | Multi-LLM second opinion on a previous analysis | 2 credits |
nexus_redteam | Adversarial red team (vulnerabilities as structured JSON) | 5 credits |
nexus_adversarial | Adversarial argument in prose over a previous analysis | 2-3 credits |
nexus_cross_border_compare | Multi-jurisdiction comparison (2-15 jurisdictions) | 2-4 credits |
nexus_jurisprudencia_search | Semantic search over the multi-jurisdiction case-law corpus | requires balance + the case-law add-on for that jurisdiction |
verify_cita | Deterministic verification of one citation (judgment or provision) against the official corpus | requires balance (+ case-law add-on if the citation is case law) |
plazos_calcular | Procedural time limits by forum. jurisdiction is required, no default: ES (LEC + LOPJ, CGPJ/regional holidays, August non-working) or GB-EAW (CPR r 2.8, clear days, England and Wales bank holidays, no August recess). Scotland and Northern Ireland are rejected: their rules and their holidays are different | requires balance |
cruce_normativa_jurisprudencia | Citation graph: provisions ↔ judgments | requires balance + case-law add-on |
box_analyze | Analysis of a Box file by file_id (requires an active Box connection) | 1-2 credits |
nexus_verificacion | Verification Centre: checks EVERY citation in a document against the official corpus (deterministic, no LLM cost) | requires balance |
nexus_playbook | Strategic negotiation playbook over a previous analysis | 2-3 credits |
nexus_compare_versions | Comparison of two versions of a document (V1 ↔ V2) | 2 credits |
nexus_conflict_check | Conflict check (conflicts of interest) over the parties to a case file | 1 credit |
nexus_inbox | Firm-wide attention inbox (what needs action) | requires balance |
nexus_chat | Legal chat with the case context | 1 credit |
nexus_normativa_search | Semantic search over legislation in force | requires balance + the legislation add-on for that jurisdiction |
nexus_normativa_articulo | Literal text of a provision at a date (lex temporis) | requires balance + legislation add-on |
nexus_normativa_pyramid | Legislative hierarchy: coverage by level | requires balance |
nexus_corpus_coverage | Inventory of the case-law corpus | read-only |
nexus_normativa_coverage | Legislation corpus coverage (jurisdictions + freshness) | read-only |
Billing: the MCP server is not free. Every call requires an account with a credit balance > 0 (paid from minute one). Premium content is per jurisdiction add-on: case law and extra legislation are add-ons (Layer 3) — the subscription includes the legislation of one jurisdiction. Without the matching add-on, searches and lookups for that jurisdiction return
403 CONTENT_NOT_ENTITLED.
On jurisdictions and coverage. 63 jurisdiction codes are selectable (GB, ES, CO, SG, US with the US-CA/US-NY/US-DE/US-TX state overlays, MULTI for cross-border, and others). Selectable is not the same as grounded: what corpus actually backs a given jurisdiction — how many provisions, when our copy was last written, whether search is enabled for it — varies, and it is not something to infer from this list. Call nexus_normativa_coverage with your key: it answers for the jurisdictions your account has active, with the figures of each. A jurisdiction with no grounding corpus still analyses, but without literal citation against an official source.
Some accounts are provisioned so that legal generation runs only on the firm's own LLM engine, with no fallback chain. That is not a limitation: it is the guarantee that documents never reach a Nexus engine.
While no provider is registered and enabled, every generative tool
(nexus_analyze, nexus_consulta, nexus_chat, nexus_draft, nexus_audit,
nexus_adversarial, nexus_redteam, nexus_doctrina, nexus_consensus,
nexus_monte_carlo, nexus_opinion, nexus_playbook, nexus_compare_versions,
nexus_cross_border_compare, box_analyze) returns:
Retrying does not fix it, and no credits are charged for a run that stops there.
Register the engine once (POST /api/v1/llm-providers, or header → AI models in
the application) and run it again.
If your engine is a reasoning model (DeepSeek V-pro, o1-style, Claude 5 with thinking), a heavy analysis can take longer than a synchronous HTTP request is allowed to last. The gateway closes the connection at 300 s — that ceiling is ours to live with, not to raise.
MEASURED on 2026-08-18: nexus_analyze in mode: "auditoria" over a ~5 KB contract, on a BYO
DeepSeek engine, went past it and returned 502. The reason is not a fault in your engine: a
reasoning model spends a large part of its completion budget thinking before it writes, and when
it runs out mid-thought Nexus automatically re-issues the call with a wider budget — which costs
more wall clock again.
Two ways round it, in order of preference:
POST /api/v1/jobs with
kind: "analyze" returns 202 and a jobId you poll (or a signed webhook). No wall clock.
This is the right door for reasoning engines and for auditoria on large documents.mode: "standard" through the MCP tool, which is materially shorter.Platform engines and mode: "standard" are unaffected: the synchronous tool is the right one
there and stays the default.
Read-only tools work without an engine, because they generate nothing:
nexus_jurisprudencia_search, verify_cita, nexus_verificacion,
nexus_normativa_search / _articulo / _pyramid, nexus_corpus_coverage,
nexus_normativa_coverage, cruce_normativa_jurisprudencia, plazos_calcular,
nexus_conflict_check (deterministic name matching, no LLM) and nexus_inbox.
| Variable | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
NEXUS_API_KEY | — | Required. An nlk_... key with mcp scope. |
NEXUS_BASE_URL | https://legal.nexusquantum.legal | For test or self-hosted environments. |
NEXUS_TIMEOUT_MS | 180000 (3 min) | Timeout for long analyses. |
Language. This package sends the same tool descriptions to every client — MCP
publishes them once, in tools/list, and no tool here takes a language argument —
so descriptions and rendered output are in English. Where a tool produces a legal
deliverable, the language of that deliverable follows the jurisdiction and the account,
not this README.
You can name the role and the party in your own terms. professionalRole takes
lawyer, solicitor, barrister, prosecutor, notary, registrar, judge,
in-house and individual. proceduralSide takes the term your forum actually uses:
claimant (England and Wales, CPR r 2.3), pursuer (Scotland), plaintiff (Northern
Ireland, which did not adopt the CPR), defendant, defender. The original Spanish wire
values — abogado, demandante, auditoria — are unchanged and will keep working: this
adds spellings, it does not retire any. Everything resolves to the same protocol value
before it reaches the analysis, so the two are interchangeable in every call.
API version: this server speaks to the Nexus v1 API, the same one used by the
TypeScript and
Python SDKs. Read-only and verification tools
call /api/v1/* routes; generative ones enter through the backend node routes with the
same nlk_ key (mcp scope), the same billing and the same BYO enforcement.
This stdio package exposes 27 of the catalogue's capabilities. The remote
connector (https://legal.nexusquantum.legal/api/mcp, nothing to install) also
exposes the case-file, firm-memory, firm-governance, legal-analytics, account and billing
capabilities. If you need any of those, use the remote connector or the v1 API directly.
[DNI_1], [ACCOUNT_3]…). The MCP client only ever sees output already re-identified by our pipeline.analysis_costs and api_usage_stats (with via_api_key_id) for billing and traceability.Apache-2.0 — see LICENSE and NOTICE.
Copyright 2026 Nexus Legal · Quantum Nexus Ventures.