Dittu vs Vibe MCP — Real Chrome, Remotely

In-depth architectural comparison of the Dittu and Vibe MCP — Real Chrome, Remotely MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Dittu when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: take_screenshot, take_screenshot_with_grid, get_raw_screenshot.

Explore Dittu Details

Choose Vibe MCP — Real Chrome, Remotely when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: navigate_to_url, go_back, click.

Explore Vibe MCP — Real Chrome, Remotely Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Dittu Developer Tools	Vibe MCP — Real Chrome, Remotely Developer Tools
Summary	Turns a phone into a camera+Bluetooth remote so AI assistants can see and control any PC.	Drive your real, logged-in Chrome from any MCP client — even from a remote machine, no inbound port.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dittu": {
      "url": "https://dittu.org"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "vibe-mcp-real-chrome-remotely": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons