Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Dijin Memory vs Liminary
In-depth architectural comparison of the Dijin Memory and Liminary MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Dijin Memory
Knowledge & Memory · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 42/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Liminary
Knowledge & Memory · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Dijin Memory if you need specialized Knowledge & Memory tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Liminary if your workspace requires Knowledge & Memory integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
D
Choose Dijin Memory when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
L
Choose Liminary when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Dijin Memory Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Liminary Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Dijin Memory Configuration
Liminary Configuration