Dida365 vs Gorev

In-depth architectural comparison of the Dida365 and Gorev MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Dida365 when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Dida365 Details

Choose Gorev when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Gorev Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Dida365 Developer Tools	Gorev Developer Tools
Summary	MCP Server for Dida365 (TickTick) Task Management Integration	Task management system for AI assistants with MCP protocol, templates, and bilingual support (TR/EN)
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dida365": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "dida365-mcp-server@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gorev": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@mehmetsenol/gorev-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons