Dex Data vs Hoodgrow MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Dex Data and Hoodgrow MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Dex Data when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_token_price, get_liquidity, get_best_venue.

Explore Dex Data Details

Choose Hoodgrow MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_catalog, get_token, get_corporate_actions.

Explore Hoodgrow MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Dex Data Finance & Fintech	Hoodgrow MCP Finance & Fintech
Summary	Multi-chain DEX prices, liquidity, routing and slippage. Free tier, no API key.	Robinhood Chain stock token data — price, adjusted supply, corporate actions.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dex-data": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "dex-data-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hoodgrow-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "hoodgrow-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons