DETRAN RS: CNH vs DETRAN MG: TRLAV

In-depth architectural comparison of the DETRAN RS: CNH and DETRAN MG: TRLAV MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose DETRAN RS: CNH when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore DETRAN RS: CNH Details

Choose DETRAN MG: TRLAV when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore DETRAN MG: TRLAV Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	DETRAN RS: CNH Developer Tools	DETRAN MG: TRLAV Developer Tools
Summary	DETRAN RS: CNH, official-source lookup. Platform-hosted, pay per query with prepaid credit.	DETRAN MG: TRLAV, official-source lookup. Platform-hosted, pay per query with prepaid credit.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "detran-rs-cnh": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "detran-rs-cnh"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "detran-mg-trlav": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "detran-mg-trlav"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons