Deskwright vs GNOME UI MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Deskwright and GNOME UI MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Deskwright when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Deskwright Details

Choose GNOME UI MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore GNOME UI MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Deskwright Developer Tools	GNOME UI MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Agents use real GNOME/Wayland apps: on your screen, or an invisible second desktop you never see	GNOME Wayland desktop automation via AT-SPI discovery and Mutter input.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "deskwright": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "deskwright"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gnome-ui-mcp": {
      "url": "http://127.0.0.1:8000/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons