Depwire vs Deepseek MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Depwire and Deepseek MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Depwire when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aggregators domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Deterministic tree-sitter dependency parsing, MCP access to local codebase graph data, What-if impact simulation.

Explore Depwire Details

Choose Deepseek MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aggregators domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (BYOK (Pay Provider Direct)).
• You have access to required keys: DEEPSEEK_API_KEY.
• Primary tools included: deepseek_chat, deepseek_fim, deepseek_sessions.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Depwire depwire Aggregators	Deepseek MCP Server arikusi Aggregators
Summary
Category & Scope	Aggregators	Aggregators
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "depwire-depwire": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "depwire-depwire"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "arikusi-deepseek-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@arikusi/deepseek-mcp-server"
      ],
      "env": {
        "DEEPSEEK_API_KEY": "YOUR_DEEPSEEK_API_KEY_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons