Deploy to Agents vs Marchward MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Deploy to Agents and Marchward MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Deploy to Agents when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Deploy to Agents Details

Choose Marchward MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Marchward MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Deploy to Agents Security	Marchward MCP Security
Summary	Audit agent-distribution surfaces and create an evidence-based distribution plan.	Runtime authority for AI agents: credential mediation, spend cap, approval gates, audit log.
Category & Scope	Security	Security
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "deploy-to-agents": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "deploytoagents"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-server-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "-p",
        "@marchward/proxy",
        "marchward-proxy"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons