Decaframe vs Easy Notion

In-depth architectural comparison of the Decaframe and Easy Notion MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Decaframe when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Decaframe Details

Choose Easy Notion when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Easy Notion Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Decaframe Workplace & Productivity	Easy Notion Workplace & Productivity
Summary	Presentations, slides, reports and one-pagers your agent designs and you edit. Exports to one file.	Markdown-first Notion MCP server. ~6-7x fewer response tokens vs official Notion MCP. 43 tools.
Category & Scope	Workplace & Productivity	Workplace & Productivity

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "decaframe": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "decaframe"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "easy-notion": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "easy-notion-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons