Dayze — Life in Days + Notable People vs Scrivener MCP
In-depth architectural comparison of the Dayze — Life in Days + Notable People and Scrivener MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Dayze — Life in Days + Notable People
Knowledge & Memory · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Scrivener MCP
Knowledge & Memory · Local stdio
Quality: 61/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Dayze — Life in Days + Notable People if you need specialized Knowledge & Memory tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Scrivener MCP if your workspace requires Knowledge & Memory integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Dayze — Life in Days + Notable People when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
People + life-in-days knowledge for AI agents. Public MCP; x402 on Base; OAuth for private tools.
Connect Scrivener 3 writing projects to Claude and other AI assistants. 47 tools for document management, writing analysis, semantic search, character/plot memory, and content enhancement. Progressive skill loading, relationship engine with HMS triplets, and JS fallback for offline semantic search. npm i -g scrivener-mcp
Dayze — Life in Days + Notable People is categorized under Knowledge & Memory and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Scrivener MCP belongs to Knowledge & Memory using local stdio subprocess. Select Dayze — Life in Days + Notable People when you need capabilities focused on knowledge & memory and Scrivener MCP when you require tools for knowledge & memory.